How MirrorMe results are made
MirrorMe turns observations from people who know you into a compact, readable result. Here is the short version: what respondents are asked, how their answers are combined, and what the result is not.
It describes the principles rather than the exact arithmetic. The rule itself is fixed: the same answers always produce the same result, and nothing is randomised, personalised per device, or adjusted after the fact.
We only ask about behaviour someone has watched
A respondent picks the closer of two options while thinking of something they actually saw — how you join a group, how you decide — rather than guessing at your private thoughts.
There is no correct answer. One response carries one observer, one relationship, and only the situations the two of you have shared.
Answers gather on five axes
Answers feed five axes: social energy, information focus, decision style, daily rhythm, and emotional tone. The first four produce the four-letter type code. Emotional tone is reported separately and never becomes part of the code. A couple test adds three relationship axes, which appear only in the private two-person report.
An axis describes a lean between two ends, not a box. Someone can sit close to the middle, and the same person can lean differently at work and at home. The percentage summarises the balance of the choices people submitted — it is not a probability or an accuracy score.
What this result is not
Type and compatibility descriptions are everyday examples. Four letters cannot tell you how a particular person will act or predict whether a relationship will last. Ask each other about your actual experiences.
MirrorMe has not been designed or validated for clinical, diagnostic, educational, or employment decisions, and results should not be used to screen or rank people. Use it to ask better questions and compare perspectives.